Quasi Criminal & Quasi Contract? Isn't This Quasi Fictional?

Lawfully.

This guy reminds me of a wrestling coach / teacher called Chopper. Chopper is a family friend who once lowered me down into a window well by my ankles to fetch a ball that had fallen in. I like Chopper. So, I may have bias but I like the way this guy talks.

image

The Sixth Amendment

image




Why can’t I seem to plead in the form of a demurrer anymore? Isn’t that repugnant in nature? Is our judiciary’s stare decisis being steered further away from the “supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”? At what point does stare decisis walk the slippery slope?

Hit me with those appeal to tradition, appeal to the big stick, appeal to authority, bandwagon, labelling, slippery slope, stone, straw man, ad hominem fallacies!

Repugnancy

image


image

image

Hang on a gosh darn minute though…

https://zchg.org/search?q=repugnancy

Authority Citation Proposition
Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. 137 (1803) Law repugnant to Constitution is void
Parsons v. Bedford 28 U.S. 433 (1830) Common law in 7th Amdt = English common law 1791
Baltimore & Carolina Line v. Redman 295 U.S. 654 (1935) 7th Amdt preserves substance of common law jury right, not mere form; protects from indirect impairment
Thomas, Why Summary Judgment is Unconstitutional 93 Va. L. Rev. 139 (2007) Summary judgment did not exist at common law in 1791; violates 7th Amdt
Eakins v. Raub 12 Serg. & Rawle 330 (Pa. 1825) State judges must void laws repugnant to Constitution
Green v. Biddle 21 U.S. 1 (1823) State act held repugnant to Constitution — explicitly using the repugnancy doctrine in a property/equity context
Curtis v. Loether 415 U.S. 189 (1974) 7th Amdt requires jury trial for statutory legal rights enforceable as damages — covers quantum meruit