"Does this smell like a political precedence or show trial? If one uses Photoshop instead of Paint as the tool for art, does anyone who isn’t nosy care? Are administrators of truth supposed to help those acting in propria persona (or partially relatable) to style their argument, and why doesn’t that seem to occur near as much as it must, nowadays? What about those “pesky” 4th and 5th Amendments if given the context? Are rights supposed to increase over time and historically, or decrease all else equal? And since it all has become so convoluted and impossible for one person to fully explore, when must we have kept things simple as they had been; and when must we not have betrayed this simplicity? Does anyone know the full and complete lineage anymore and if not, isn’t that a problem? Isn’t it called flooding when even an enriched professional augmented by bot can’t proficiently find them all at show time? Show time, show time, our persona virtue signaling groveling to the gavel having broadcast more lost of fundamentals while “all the world’s” staged? Would anyone care if the pro se lawyer is deleted and the Monopoly’s gates finally finish closing? Repugnancy fits in both here, and there, as well..
Say, why can’t one take a recording device and seemingly other electronics into certain courtrooms per but not limited to those “pesky” 1st, 9th, 10th Amendments, other (constructive) “pests” of due process?
*William Shakespeare"
