Robert P. George is a prominent figure in the small but mighty world of American Jurisprudence. Shortly after I started paying homage to his posts, he tightened his rules for engaging with him in this our public forum. I have to wonder why he chose to do that, as I think anyone who would assert oneself in this or any other matter of import should do the opposite. Credibility requires openness of discussion, does it not?
Any case, this man knows the Law. Perhaps better than anyone else in these times. Now, I didn’t say he projects the Law, I said he knows it. There is an extremely precise poignancy here.
Obama knew the Law too, I didn’t say he projected the Law, I said he knew it. It is my opinion that he was using this knowledge to drive a wedge between The People and the contractual obligations of government to protect The People.
Prior, I had introduced the older (and I think much better, particularly in consideration of Repugnancy which Carl Miller kept on harping about) works of the respected Mr. Putney.
Through the lens of the highlighted - “Although Sinema appears to reside in both Arizona and Washington, D.C., where she’s now a high-powered lawyer” - in the context of Putney’s own verbiage as pertains, I think these proceedings are attempting to write over the law. There might be other more immediate reasons, there often are.
And, I think a lot of what the prominent Mr. Robert P. George posts enter the realm of stare decisis (the legal principle of following past court precedents) subtly and further escaping repugnancy.
This is a show trial.
You want to know what I think? The biblical family, and not this abomination called legal or licensed family, is the most powerful lawful weapon against the progression of this machine.
